These notes apply the Fractal Persistence Equation (FPE) and its behavioural reading — aggression (numerator: \(P_{in}\eta\)) and empathy (denominator: \(\mathcal{D}_{KL}\), \(\Gamma\)) — to familiar psychological and relational patterns.
They are companion essays, not a clinical manual. For the full derivation and philosophical context, see:
persistence.md — short statement of the FPEpapers/information_persisting_systems.md — formal lawbooks/book1/part4b.md — aggression, empathy, respect (Chapters 31.1–31.4)books/aggression_empathy.md — standalone volume on the same themes| FPE term | In relationships / psyche |
|---|---|
| \(P_{in}\eta\) | Boundary enforcement, assertive “no”, targeted consequence |
| Low \(\eta\) | Rage, passive aggression, drama, identity attacks |
| \(\mathcal{D}_{KL}\) | Denial, deception, delusion, “story” vs reality |
| \(\Gamma\) | Unresolved conflict, contempt, recurring fights, stonewalling |
| \(\Phi\) | Body, sleep, attachment substrate, “can I actually do this?” |
| \(\Psi\) | Family, workplace, culture, ecology that shields or fails you |
| \(\mathcal{R} \ge 1\) | The agent/relationship still exists as a distinct node |
| Warrior–Sage | Enough aggression and enough honesty/empathy to persist |
Aggression here is ethological, not moral: costly behaviour that maintains the self/other boundary. Empathy is not “being nice”; it is lowering model error and friction in a coupled system — and it fails when it crosses the boundary set by aggression.
| Topic | File |
|---|---|
| Fractal layers — body, self, family, society, state | ../fractal_layers.md |
| Sociology — households, workplaces, communities | ../sociology/README.md |
| Software at this layer | aion-llm — token-level persistence; see ../stack_and_layers.md |
| Topic | File |
|---|---|
| Shared vocabulary and reading guide | framework.md |
| Karpman drama triangle | drama_triangle.md |
| Attachment styles as coupling patterns | attachment_and_coupling.md |
| People-pleasing, codependency, fawning | people_pleasing.md |
| Escalation, Gottman’s horsemen, rupture–repair | friction_cycles.md |
| Burnout, compassion fatigue, substrate collapse | burnout_and_substrate.md |
| Denial, dissociation, cognitive dissonance | denial_and_self_deception.md |
| Epistemic humility vs. ego preservation | epistemic_humility_vs_ego_preservation.md |
| Dark triad, psychopathy, ASPD | dark_triad_and_aspd.md |
| Voice, exit, loyalty (Hirschman) | voice_exit_loyalty.md |
Each essay follows the same spine:
Nothing here replaces therapy, diagnosis, or crisis care. The point is to show that many “moral” or “personality” labels are often accounting labels for how a node is managing \(\mathcal{R}\) in real time.