Family sociology describes households as role systems: who cooks, who earns, who regulates children, who holds secrets. Family systems therapy adds homeostasis — families resist change because the current dysfunction stabilises someone’s role. In FPE terms, a household is a level-\(L+1\) node whose \(\Phi\) is the nervous systems of its members and whose persistence depends on shared models staying cheap enough to coordinate.
| Concept | What it names |
|---|---|
| Emotional labour (Hochschild) | Invisible work of managing others’ affect and household mood |
| Identified patient | One member scapegoated as “the problem” while the system stays unchanged |
| Enmeshment / differentiation (Bowen) | Boundaries between self and family collapsed or healthy |
| Intergenerational transmission | Trauma, norms, and attachment patterns passed to children’s \(\Phi\) |
Families persist not because everyone is happy but because \(\mathcal{R}^{(\text{household})} \ge 1\) — the pattern of roles, stories, and couplings continues as a recognisable node.
A household IPS stores information in people, not in filing cabinets. Address, law, and dinner table are the Markov blanket; photos and deeds are pointers.
| Term | Household reading |
|---|---|
| \(\Phi\) | Members’ health, regulation capacity, attachment, skills |
| \(P_{in}\eta\) | Income + attention spent on coordination (scheduling, childcare, repair) |
| \(\mathcal{D}_{KL}\) | Joint broadcast (“everything is fine”) vs private ISMs; secret affairs; money lies |
| \(\Gamma\) | Unresolved fights, role conflicts, unpaid emotional debts |
| \(\omega\) | Family “rules” nobody follows; ritual complexity without repair |
| \(\Psi\) | Extended kin, school, employer benefits, welfare state |
Emotional labour is \(P_{in}\eta\) spent on others’ denominators — lowering \(\mathcal{D}_{KL}\) and \(\Gamma\) for the unit while the labourer pays the cost on their own ISM. When unevenly distributed, one member’s \(\mathcal{R}^{(L)}\) falls while the household looks stable — classic substrate export upward from individual to collective appearance.
The identified patient holds unresolved friction for the subsystem so adults avoid operation 1+2 with each other. The child’s \(\Phi\) pays (symptoms, school failure, acting out) while parental \(\Gamma\) stays artificially low — same geometry as the drama triangle Victim at \(L+1\) scale (drama_triangle.md).
Children are downstream \(\Phi\). When parents run high \(\mathcal{D}_{KL}\) or export \(\Gamma\) without repair, the next generation inherits:
This is not determinism — but the fractal books close: parent persistence supervenes on child persistence (Theorem 5.3).
Dysfunctional equilibria persist when short-term \(\mathcal{R}\) for role-holders beats the cost of the two operations:
flowchart LR
AvoidTruth["Avoid op. 1\n(D_KL hidden)"]
AvoidRepair["Avoid op. 2\n(Gamma deferred)"]
Export["Export to child\nor one partner"]
Stable["Household looks\nstable today"]
AvoidTruth --> Stable
AvoidRepair --> Stable
Export --> Stable
Each arrow is entropy export — someone else pays later.